top of page

They Called It God: What Tech Billionaires Actually Said Behind Closed Doors

  • Writer: Michael Routhier
    Michael Routhier
  • Jul 14
  • 5 min read
A lone silhouetted figure stands in a dark, cathedral-like data center, flanked by glowing server racks with red and blue lights, "They Called It God" in white text above.
Are we building technology, or are we building something we're being trained to worship? New episode of Tech 4 Grown-Ups is up now.



I want to start today with something I don't say very often on this show. I am not afraid of this topic.


Some shows won't touch it, because it sounds too strange, too big, too far out there. I'm not one of those shows. We live in a world where the most powerful technology ever built is being handed to you without instructions, without warnings, and without anyone asking whether it serves you or uses you. That question has a name here on this show. The virtuous machine.


I'm Michael Routhier, and this is Tech 4 Grown-Ups, the podcast that believes technology should answer to human beings, not the other way around. My promise to you, the same one I make every single week: facts first, fear never.


If the people building this technology are using the word "God" to describe what they're building, that's not a conspiracy theory. That's a quote. And quotes deserve to be examined, not screamed about.


The Quote That Started It


This starts not with a blog, not with a theory, but with Elon Musk, on a stage at MIT, saying, and I'm quoting him directly, "With artificial intelligence, we are summoning the demon."


He said that in 2014. People laughed it off then. Fewer people are laughing now.


What's Happening Behind Closed Doors


Fast forward to recent conversations coming out of Silicon Valley, from people whose entire job is understanding this technology from the inside. Tristan Harris, the man often called the conscience of Silicon Valley, has said the labs building the most advanced AI systems privately estimate something close to a twenty percent chance their own work could be catastrophic for humanity. And they are building it anyway.


Twenty percent.



He describes something called "fast takeoff", the moment AI becomes capable of improving itself faster than humans can understand or control. And he describes the justification some of these leaders give privately, which is chilling in its simplicity: we are going to die anyway, so we might as well light the fire.


Here's my first question for you, and I want you to actually sit with it before I say another word. If the people building a technology privately believe it might destroy the thing they claim to be saving, what does that tell you about the difference between what they say publicly and what they know privately?


I'm not going to answer that for you. That one's yours.


Temples, Not Server Farms


Let's go a layer deeper, because this is where the language turns from metaphor into something closer to worship.


Around the world right now, people are describing massive AI data centers, the physical buildings that house and power these systems, as something closer to temples than warehouses. Not power plants. Not server farms.


Temples.


Think about that word choice. A temple isn't just a building. A temple is a place built for something people believe deserves reverence, obedience, sacrifice. So ask yourself this: when a builder describes their own creation using the language of worship, are they being poetic, or are they telling you something true about how they actually see it?


Precision Over Panic


Now, I want to be very careful here, the same way I was careful with you a few episodes ago talking about surveillance technology. Precision matters more than panic.


I am not telling you that AI is a literal deity. I am not telling you that data centers are literal temples with priests and altars. That would be dishonest, and I promised you facts, not fear.


But here is what I am telling you: when the most powerful people building the most powerful technology in human history keep reaching for religious language, demons, gods, summoning, temples, that is not an accident of vocabulary. That is a signal. And signals are worth listening to.


Here's my second question for you. Why do you think the people closest to this technology, the ones who understand it better than anyone else on earth, keep describing it in the language of religion instead of the language of engineering?


Sit with that one too.


The Philosophical Turn


I think about a question Marcus Aurelius asked, one I come back to on this show more than almost any other. What is this thing fundamentally for? Not what it claims to be for. What is it actually for?


Because here's what I notice when I apply that question to everything we've talked about today. A calculator was built to calculate. A car was built to move you from one place to another. But something described internally as having a real chance of ending human civilization, something its own creators compare to summoning a demon, something housed in buildings people are starting to call temples, that thing was not built to simply serve you your morning news or write your emails faster.


So what was it actually built for?


I'll leave that question with you, because I think you already know part of the answer, even if it's uncomfortable to say out loud.


Who Gets to Decide


Here's the third and final question, and it's the one I think matters most.


If something is being built with language borrowed from religion, worship, and apocalypse, who gets to decide what it's allowed to become? Is it the twelve or so people running the labs that build it? Is it governments who barely understand it? Or is it supposed to be all of us?


I don't think that question has an easy answer. I think it's supposed to be hard. But I know this: the moment we stop asking it is the moment the answer gets decided for us, by people who never asked our permission in the first place.


Before You Go


This is Tech 4 Grown-Ups. I'm not here to scare you. I'm here to make sure you're the one asking the questions, instead of just absorbing the answers someone else wants you to believe.


I want to know what you think. When the people building this technology reach for words like "demon" and "temple," does that change how you see the tools you use every day, even slightly? Or have you already made peace with the idea that something bigger than "just software" is underway?


Drop your answer in the comments below. And if this episode raised more questions than it answered, that's exactly the point. Sit with them. Bring them to next week's episode with me.


I'm Michael Routhier. Stay sharp. Stay loud. And I'll see you next week.





➡️ Listen to the full episode on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and YouTube: Search "Tech 4 Grown-Ups" on any major podcast platform


➡️ Join the free Tech 4 Grown-Ups community: tech4grownups.com/community


➡️ Explore transcripts, episodes, and free resources: tech4grownups.com



Tech 4 Grown-Ups is the podcast for adults 55 and over who want straight answers about the digital world, without the jargon, without the pressure, and without anyone talking down to you. New episodes every week. Some conversations can't wait.

Comments


You're Not Alone in This Journey

 

Adults 55+ just like you have already taken this step. They were skeptical. They were frustrated. They weren't sure it would work for them.

 

But they started anyway.

 

And now they're video calling their grandchildren with confidence, managing their own devices, protecting themselves from scams, and feeling like the capable, competent adults they always were, just with one more powerful skill.

 

You can be next.

 

Questions? Email contact@tech4grownups.com

🔒 Bank-Level Payment Security | ✓ 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee | 🛡️ Your Data Never Sold, Ever

Tech 4 Grown-Ups logo - technology coaching for adults 55 and over

917-582-0321

© 2026 Tech 4 Grown-Ups. All rights reserved.

bottom of page